EE 590F

Course Project
Power system planning (Fall 2008)

M, W  12-1:15, 1242 Howe

Dr. Jim McCalley

Dr. McCalley's Home Page

 

Schedule

Course objectives

Course structure

Groups

Back to Home Page

Course project

 
 
Description of Course Structure for EE 590F, Fall 2008

Overall Objective of the Class Project:  The objective of this assignment, with respect to the total effort of all students in the course, is to implement state-of-the-art modeling and computational capabilities in performing energy system design at the national level, and to identify areas where such modeling and capabilities need enhancement.

 

Approach: The following outlines the approach to be taken in this project. More details

1.       Groups: Each student will be assigned to a group to perform this assignment.

2.       Analysis tools: Each group will be provided with an analysis tool to perform their design.

3.       Futures: Each group will identify a number of futures equal to the number of students in the group.

4.       Design objective: The design objective is to develop a new transmission overlay for the United States that will serve the nation’s energy needs for the next 40 years.

5.       Design criteria: Each group will perform the design to optimize several objectives.

6.       Data: Some data will be provided, but you are free to enhance it.

The above items will be further described in the following sections. Additional information will be provided during the semester.

 

1. Groups

Groups will be formed based on the following criteria:

·    Each group will have at least one off-campus student and one on-campus student.

·    Effort will be made to assign equal number of students to each group.

·    Requests will be honored where possible, to the extent that they do not inhibit application of the first two criteria.

 

2. Analysis tools

Use of commercial grade tools is strongly encouraged. Off-campus students may make use of tools available to them in their work place insofar as doing so does

is not in violation of binding agreements. The following tools will be made available to students:

1.       PLEXOS – see http://www.plexossolutions.com/.

2.       WASP-IV – see http://www.adica.com/wasp_iv.html.

3.       PROMOD – see http://www1.ventyx.com/analytics/promod.asp.

4.       STRATEGIST – see http://www1.ventyx.com/analytics/Strategist.asp.

5.       EGEAS – see

 

3. Futures

Each group must identify futures to be analyzed. The number of futures identified should equal the number of students in the group, so that each student is responsible for analyzing one future. Futures should be identified via assumptions on issues viewed to be of high influence to the analysis outcome. Some of these issues could be, for example,

·    Growth of traditional electric loads

·    Growth of transportation-related electric loads

·    Cost of emitting greenhouse gases

·    Wind penetration level in different regions

·    Natural gas prices

·    Ability to build transmission is specific states

·    Cost of building nuclear plants and cost of addressing nuclear wastes

·    Water availability in key river systems throughout the country

·    Cost of clean-coal technologies such as integrated gasification combined cycle units

·    Cost of solar generation technologies

·    Transmission and substation cost per MW-mile by transmission voltage and construction type (e.g., 765kV, 765 kV HSIL, 800 kV GIL, 800 kV HVDC)

 

4. Design objective

Each group must develop a new transmission overlay design for the United States that will serve the nation’s energy needs for the next 40 years. A preliminary

design that should be considered as a starting point is given in Figure A below, a preliminary proposal made by AEP. In this figure, all circuits represented in green

are new 765 kV circuits. A very highly aggregated model of the nation’s existing electric network is given in Figure B. Some groups may want or need to represent

the natural gas system or the coal transportation system. Figures C and D illustrate highly aggregated models for these systems that could be used.

               

Figure A: Proposed electric overlay                                                                                              Figure B: Existing electric system

 

                             

Figure C: Natural gas production, storage, & transportation                  Figure D: Coal production and transportation system

 

5. Design criteria

The design criteria, i.e., the criteria used to judge the desirability of each design, are as follows:

1.       Cost: The investment cost (net present worth) of the design should be minimized. The operational cost (net present worth) of the design should be minimized.

2.       Adequacy: Demand should be met subject to loss of any one circuit.

3.       Resiliency: Short-term and mid-term electric energy prices should remain stable even after catastrophic disturbances (e.g., Katrina) occur to the system.

4.       Sustainability: Greenhouse gas emissions should be minimized. Reserves on depleteable fuels (coal, gas, uranium) should remain high enough that each such fuel remains a viable energy source.

6. Data

The following data will be provided for you.

1.       Transmission impedances of circuits indicated in Figure A above.

a.       765 kV Line & Transformer Impedance, Rating, and Cost Data

b.       HVDC Data

2.       Transmission impedances of circuits indicated in Figure B above.

3.       Generation, load data, and link capacities corresponding to 2005 for the network models given in Figures A and B.

4.       Link capacities corresponding to 2005 for the network models given in Figures C and D.